Climate Reality Project

The Climate Reality Project is a group of climate activists founded by Al Gore in 2007. Their mission is to raise awareness and “catalyze a global solution to the climate crisis by making urgent action a necessity across every level of society.” On their website they have links to videos about what you can do, and an ebook that you can download for free that explains wind energy and debunks a lot of the myths about its efficiency and effect on the economy and jobs. 
This group is really active and has several initiative projects in the works. Working to engage different demographics in the struggle against climate change is something that the Climate Reality Project is doing very effectively. Targeting musicians, winter sport  lovers, and educators are just a few examples. Their website also includes a page with a bunch of basic information about climate change, denial, and what you can do to make a difference. It’s like a one-stop-climate-change-information-shop.

Climate Change in Future Careers

Taking this class has really made me reevaluate what kind of career I want to go into, and my priorities not only as an individual, but how I can help influence and change the priorities of others and those within my field of choice. Before I didn’t really have any kind of idea what I wanted to do after graduation, I was planning on getting my BFA in painting and then just kinda winging it from there. This class, and really all the classes I’ve taken this year have helped me realize that I want to become an art therapist. Art is so important to me, and I also really enjoy helping people and listening to them talk about their lives, so combining the two just makes sense. I don’t know why I didn’t think of it sooner. That being said I am going to have to either double major or minor in psychology, in order to be able to study art therapy in graduate school.

The task of addressing climate change within the art therapy field can be done by providing creative therapy for victims of climate disasters. In October, 2015, there was a lecture/talk about the combination of climate change, art, and therapy put on by the Global Sustainability Institute that sounded like it raised a lot of questions and topic points relating to the benefits and logistics of climate change and art therapy. Here is a prezi explaining how art therapy can and has been used to provide a way for children who have been through natural disasters to better express themselves. From what I’ve found I think that not a lot of therapy, let alone art therapy, is being provided for those who struggled through natural disasters, I don’t think most people think of them as people who might have some form of PTSD or are in need of therapy. Just because it might not be seen as as traumatic as being in a war or a victim of domestic violence by mainstream media, doesn’t mean that these people don’t need or couldn’t benefit from therapy. I am really looking forward to the rest of my schooling and the prospect of going on to graduate school excites me.

Precipice

 

When asked to play a climate change themed video game I initially had my doubts that I would find one that would interest me as someone who doesn't particularly enjoy playing video games. Initially I found a game called Never Alone, which had beautiful graphics and what looked like it was going to be a great storyline. Later on I found out it was $14.99 on Steam, and I am really not trying to pay for a video game at this point in my life. However I found Precipice, which was free (yay!!) and wasn't yet taken on the list of games (possibly because you had to download it….it took me 25 minutes). So after that I loaded the game and it was actually more of an interactive story than a stereotypical “video game”. Initially you start out in the year 2030, the world has been ravaged by floods and other various climate disasters. The game lets you go back in time to 2010 and interact with three people, George, Paula, and Marcus. Marcus and Paula are married, and Paula has all these great ideas about climate change and what society has to do as a whole to better the situation. You have three goals in the game, and each one is linked to a character and how your actions and conversation can get them to realize their potential when it comes to climate change and creating a better future not only for themselves but also future generations. Entering into conversations with these characters, you are given several options for what to say, and your job is to prompt George and Marcus into realizing that their preconceived notions about climate change and how it’s not going to affect them in their home is grossly wrong, or trying to get Paula to share her ideas with the general public. Then the game transports you back to 2030 to see how your initial actions changed or didn’t change the future. I enjoyed this game because it shows that even starting a conversation can change someone’s point of view, their life, and the future. All of the characters are also great sources of information about how the world really is and how misinformation can be so toxic. It shows the player how their actions can either open someone up or close their mind to environmental issues. Here is a link to the download page for this game. It's a pretty short game, but has a lot of interesting information and concepts.

Hell

The year is 2016, solar flares have caused the Earth’s temperature to rise 10 degrees Celsius. It is near impossible to be outside during the day because of the sun’s enormous radiating heat. Literally scorching the planet, and anything that is out for more than a few hours. A few humans have survived this hellish landscape. Sisters Marie and Leonie, and two men named Phillip and Tom travel towards the mountains in a car with covered windows, siphoning gas from wrecked and abandoned vehicles. There is little to no water left on Earth, but rumor has it it still rains in the mountains. This film is called “Hell”, meaning “bright” in German. Released in 2011, directed by Tim Fehlbaum, Hell is a post apocalyptic horror/thriller movie set in Germany. It has an English dubbed version, but personally I don’t think that the emotion is conveyed the same. I tried watching it in English but didn’t get very far before I switched it back to German.

Without giving away too much of the ending, I’ll just say that the characters encounter some other survivors and things get...a little crazy. It shows that in a climate disaster, the real threat isn’t necessarily the deteriorating environment, it’s how people react to it. This movie serves as a great example of what happens when people are driven to the extremes by climate change. I didn’t write my wiki post about this movie, even though it deals with the direct effects of climate change more directly and frequently than the book I read (Feed, M.T. Anderson), because this movie is in no way appropriate for classroom viewing. It is very violent and has some possibly triggering scenes of forced sexual advances. However, I do think it is interesting to compare different possible future worlds that have been affected by climate change, and this movie poses a possible future that could lend a hand to answering the question, what will our world look like as it heats up, and how will people react to it?

Zeitoun

     Zeitoun by Dave Eggers is a novel about the Zeitoun family and their experience during hurricane Katrina. The Zeitoun's are a muslim family living in New Orleans, the father, Abdulrahman (though everyone called him Zeitoun), immigrated from Syria and started a painting and contracting business. The mother, Kathy, a Baton Rouge native, converted to Islam and helps run the business and care for their three daughters and her one son. Since this is a true story about a real family, it goes into great detail about the family themselves, little stories from their past, how Zeitoun and Kathy met, Zeitoun's life in Syria, and how the business is fairing. It alternates between the perspectives of Zeitoun and Kathy. This book would be a great way to introduce that type of writing style.

When Katrina was coming up on New Orleans, Kathy and the kids left for Baton Rouge to stay with a few of her sisters. Zeitoun decided to stay behind. He was able to save a lot of the family's belongings when the levees eventually broke and the city was drowned in about 15 feet of water. My favorite parts of this book are when Eggers is describing how the world looks when covered with water. Zeitoun has a canoe in which he paddles around the city, helping save stranded people and animals. He lives like this for a while, keeping in contact with Kathy through a phone that still works in one of the rental houses he owns. Zeitoun and three other men who are using the phone are later arrested for "looting"...in their own home. They are all taken to a makeshift jail behind the Greyhound station (which was built using man-power imported from the Louisiana State Pen. only days after the storm) , not given a phone call, or read their rights. They are accused of being terrorists and are made to stay in a cage outside containing only a metal rail and expected to sleep on the filthy ground. These conditions persist for several days, when finally they are put on a bus and taken to a prison in St. Gabriel. They are still denied a phone call, and as hard as Zeitoun tries he is unable to convince anyone that he is innocent until finally gets a priest to contact Kathy on his behalf. From there the book covers Kathy's efforts to get Zeitoun out of prison. She is met with people who tell her the location of the hearing is “classified information” and a bunch of other ridiculous things that, had the government been working properly, would never have happened. Though eventually Zeitoun is released from prison, it was apparent that the judicial system was not working for a very long time after the storm, and many people suffered because of that.

Reading this book gave me a lot of emotions. At some points I was disgusted with the actions of people in power, and the actions of the prison system as a whole. Racial and religious profiling are still a problem in America and this book just reinforced the fact that the care and safety of POC and low income individuals are not a priority in this country. It makes me very sad that the people and institutions put in place to protect citizens could do such a botch job. I understand that after the hurricane nothing was working properly, but it seems silly to prioritize building a temporary jail instead of using those resources and money to save the hundreds of civilians who were trapped in their homes. Climate disasters wreck the whole system.

Desert Solitaire

Desert Solitaire: A Season in the Wilderness by Edward Abbey is the storey of a man (Abbey) who worked as a national park ranger in Utah for Arches National Monument. The book was written in 1968, so it’s a few decades old and the picture Abbey paints of the wild desert is one that I’m sure exists next to nowhere in the current world. In the first few chapters Abbey describes the land that he is living on, the little house-trailer that he is staying in and the many creatures that call the Utah desert home. As someone who loves to read about nature and has a soft spot for personification and descriptive language, so far this book has been a dream. In describing his book Abbey writes, “I believe that there is a kind of poetry, even a kind of truth, in simple fact. But the desert is a vast world, an oceanic world, as deep in its way and complex and various as the sea. Language makes a mighty loose net with which to go fishing for simple facts, when facts are infinite.” (pg XIV)

This book has really made me stop and appreciate things in my own world more. On the first page Abbey states that “Every man, every woman, carries in heart and mind the image of the ideal place, the right place, the one true home, known or unknown, actual or visionary.” This got me thinking, and I experienced what I believe to be the beginnings of my perfect place. I was walking home around 11 o’clock the other night, and it was softly snowing, but there was no wind. I was walking through campus and that late I rarely see anyone, maybe a few people at the most. This night however, I got the overwhelming feeling that I was the only person on the whole of campus. All the buildings had their lights shut off, it was so quiet. My footsteps in the snow where deafening. I didn’t even hear cars or snow plows in the distance. It was in this gentle silence that I found my perfect place. It is peaceful, the cold and snow keep it that way. Everything was asleep and I was there to witness it. I love it when books can help me notice moments like that.

Getting back on topic, there was a bit of the second section of Desert Solitaire, aptly titled “Solitaire”, where Abbey describes turning on an electricity generator to power his trailer house when the sun goes down. He says that he is “shut off from the natural world and sealed up, encapsulated, in a box of artificial light and tyrannical noise.” (pg 13) I felt that this line really speaks of how we as a civilization are. Disconnected from the natural world with barriers of light emitted from countless electronic devices. Smartphones distracting those from everything going on around them, streetlights choking out the stars, neon everywhere. Abbey continues “I have cut myself off completely from the greater world which surrounds the man-made shell.” (pg 13) Again, this is exactly how we live, except we can’t turn off the generator and return to a peaceful night. One has to drive for hours to reach somewhere void enough of light pollution to even experience true night. Above is a map of Michigan showing its light pollution levels. The great thing about this site is that you can zoom in, below is our lovely WMU campus! It's got the whole world so you can see which countries or areas have the most light pollution. The interesting thing is that it's got data going back to 2010, and if you switch back to that overlay you can see that light pollution used to be way worse, which suprised me.

So far I am really enjoying this book, I can’t wait to read what else Abbey has to say about the desert, nature, and how we are all connected. “We are kindred all of us, killer and victim, predator and prey, me and the sly coyote, the soaring buzzard, the elegant gopher snake, the trembling cottontail, the foul worms that feed on our entrails, all of them, all of us. Long live diversity, long live the earth!” (pg 34)

Waste Land

     Waste Land is a art documentary with an environmental twist. It follows Brazilian artist Vik Muniz as he works with the Association of Collectors of the Metropolitan Landfill of Jardim Gramacho, a group of people who salvage recyclable materials from the Jardim Gramacho landfill in Janeiro Brazil, the largest landfill in the world. Vik Muniz is a photographer, who makes his work out of found materials. This movie focuses on his series made out of recyclable materials salvaged from the Jardim Gramacho landfill, and the people who work there and recreated their portraits out of the materials they collect all day. The thing that struck me the most about this film is how human everyone is, the garbage pickers, or catadores in Portuguese, are so human it hurts. They are funny, they are raw and real, they have the most important things to say about consumption and waste. One man, Valter dos Santos, while talking about how some people don’t think that recycling makes a difference said “One single can is of great importance. Because 99 is not 100, and that single one will make the difference.” A woman named Magna de Franca Santos said “It’s easy for you to be sitting there at home in front of your television consuming whatever you want and tossing everything in the trash and leaving it out on the street for the garbage trucks to take it away. But where does that garbage go?” She then gave the camera a now-you-think-about-that-for-a-while half smile and nod. These people work for $20-$25 a day, sorting recyclables on literal mountains of garbage. It is breathtaking seeing a whole island of trash, and the humans in scale with it, it is astounding.

This film really speaks of the human’s ability to waste an insane amount of matter, and our talent for casting things undesirable to the side. Muniz put it as “this is where everything that is not good goes, including the people.” Throughout the course of the film, with the people Muniz gets to help make the pieces of art, and to pose for them, you really fall in love with them. Their spirit, their personalities. These are human beings and it broke my heart to learn how some have to live. One woman, Suelem Pereira Dias, has worked in the dump since she was 7 (she was 18 at the time of filming), she is such a beautiful young lady, posed with her two children, immortalized in trash. She said that “If I don’t die, it’s not bad.” One day she found a dead child amongst the trash, “There was a baby there that had been thrown away.” We are a throw away species, it seems like it's all we know how to do.

Although the movie was about this artist working with catadores to create deep, socially charged works of art, for the purposes of this class I think the most important thing to take away from this movie was the sheer amount that is being thrown out, that could have been recycled. The catadores collect 200 tons of recyclable materials a day. That is absolutely insane.

Jardim Gramacho closed in 2012, the site now being used to transform greenhouses gasses into energy to power houses and cars. This still displaced over 1,700 people who used the landfill to earn a living.

Learning to Die in the Anthropocene

Learning to Die in the Anthropocene: Reflections on the End of a Civilization by Roy Scranton is a little 117 page horror story about climate change and how we as a civilization must set aside our fears and pride and learn to die gracefully when the Earth is no longer a place where we can live. As we have made it such. I chose this book because the title intrigued me in the sense that this is something I can’t exactly look up on wikiHow. In the first half of the book, Scranton summarizes what we as a species have done to this planet, something we all should know well from reading Eaarth by Bill McKibben. Scranton puts an emphasis on the fact that humans evolved in a perfect sweet spot, what really shocked me was that the climate goes through cycles, and that “the Earth has cooled, and it has been in an “icehouse” state for more than two and a half million years. We have very likely brought that state to a premature end.” (pg35) The thought that one species could change the entire climate of the Earth is horrifying, and true. The thing that Scranton brings up that I really appreciate is that the climate has changed before, but it did so slowly and we were able to adapt and move around to be in a more comfortable climate. But this time it’s happening so fast, and this time we know that we are the cause.

Scranton also speaks about how hard it is for the average citizen to raise any awareness or get anything done relating to climate change because “no matter how many people take to the streets in massive marches or in target direct actions they cannot put their hands on the real flows of power, because they do not help produce it. They only consume.” (pg 60) He raises the point that it is the few powerful corporations who have all the power relating to coal production and CO2 emissions because they are the ones who produce it, and those who consume are always going to be at their hands. This is a very important point and gives me a reason why I feel so helpless to this whole situation we’ve got ourselves into.

Another thing that Scranton said that made me stop and think was that “every time you check your email, you’re heating up the planet” (pg 68) It’s something that i don’t think about, how electronic things, even cell phone, the internet, it all runs on coal. On the same page he goes on to say that “The problem is that the problem is too big. The problem is that different people want different things. the problem is that nobody has real answers. The problem is that the problem is us.” Which I think is a really beautiful way to put it.

This book is very short but it’s got a lot of important things to say, even if it starts a little depressisng by insinuating that “we have to learn to die not as individuals, but as a civilization.” (pg 21). Then again, climate change is nothing but depressing.

Ocean Acidification

Ocean acidification occurs when carbon dioxide gets combined with seawater, which results in carbonic acid. Carbonic acid lowers seawater pH levels. Seawater naturally buffers against pH changes, but that process uses up carbonate ions in the water, which are an "essential ingredient in the creation of calcium carbonate shells and skeletons produced by a large number of marine animals" such as coral, marine plankton coralline algae, and shellfish. As the levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere increase, so do the levels in the ocean, which raise the temperature, which make it harder to live there. It is a vicious cycle, everything is connected. It’s hard to find something that has gone completely unaffected by the rising levels of CO2 on the planet.

Although every living thing in the ocean is affected by falling pH levels, one of the things most at risk are coral reefs. Coral reefs house the highest levels of marine biodiversity, they’re basically like rainforests under the water. They protect coastlines from ocean erosion and help reduce the size of waves coming in from open waters.

Coral reefs are facing a whole slew of anthropogenic issues, including (but not limited to), increasing size and frequency of storms, rising of sea levels and temperatures, and even depletion of the ozone layer. Those are just the global issues, on a local scale coral reefs face water pollution and destruction from fishers and careless tourists.

To me, the really frightening thing about ocean acidification is how badly we’ve messed it up, and how long some scientists expect it to take to rectify itself. The pH levels of the ocean before the Industrial Revolution were at about 8.0. Since then levels have dropped a whole .1 units. Now that doesn’t sound like a lot, but take into consideration that it’s the entire ocean, the whole ocean. Over 70% of the Earth. It’s noticeable. The Royal Society of the UK predicts that by 2100, pH levels will drop another .5 units. That study was done in 2005, and we haven’t really done anything since then to really cut CO2 emissions. The terrifying thing about that is that they project that it will take the ocean 10,000 years to return to Pre-Industrial Revolution pH levels. I’m assuming that that is if we immediately cut CO2 emissions, and stop polluting our oceans.

Here is a link to my presentation slides.

"Why don't we just...wait here for a little while...see what happens?" - MacReady, The Thing (1982)

Chapter 2 of Eaarth by Bill McKibben focused primarily on the economy of the world, and how it has lead to the disastrous global changes we are seeing today. Larry Summers put the American government’s views of economic growth as truthfully as possible when he said that they  “cannot and will not accept any ‘speed limit’ on American economic growth. It is the task of economic policy to grow the economy as rapidly, sustainably, and inclusively as possible.”(47). It is exactly this type of attitude that got us where we are today. It is no longer viable and feasible to have a continuously growing economy, especially a rapidly growing one. “We don’t just need a bailout. We need a reboot. We need a build out. We need a buildup. We need a national makeover.”(50). One thing that really struck me as honestly just stupid, is that the government is constantly trying to say that the cost of cleaning up this planet, for looking for and implementing clean means of energy production, is too expensive. Yes, it is expensive, the cost for curing this world is astronomical. However, the cost for damage and repairs to cities that are being ravaged by storms year after year, storms that are not going to stop happening (they are a permanent fixture of this new Eaarth) cannot possibly be less expensive in the long run. We are already spending billions of dollars trying to protect the southern states from hurricanes. Hurricanes that are just getting worse as the planet warms and sea levels rise.

    It seems like every chapter of Eaarth alerts me to new and terrifying facts about the state of the world. This time it was the new strain of Death Mosquito that has made it’s horrific debut in Bangladesh. The really sad thing is that the people who live in Bangladesh’s capital, Dhaka, have contributed almost nothing to this global state of warming. This new mosquito, Aedes aegypti, carries dengue fever, a disease that is affecting millions and can be fatal to the young, old, and weak. If the rising temperatures and stagnant water are contributing to the spread of disease, who knows what is to come. We might soon have a “The Thing” type case on our hands, where the melting of ice in the arctic releases untold horrors from ages ago. This might be as exciting as a shape shifting alien, or immensely dangerous and unsettling as a long dead disease.

    Getting back to the economy and how humans seem to care more for it than the health of others, the Club of Rome was a group of “European industrialists and scientists”(90) that published a book that detailed what would happen if we continued on our course of polluting the Earth. It is called Limits to Growth and was published in 1972, McKibben put it very poetically with a cute little rhyme that goes, “They foresaw this planet Eaarth, and if we’d heeded them we might have prevented its birth.”(91) In this book the authors came to three conclusions, the second of which really made me stop and think:

“2. It is possible to alter these growth trends and to establish a condition of ecological and economic stability that is sustainable far into the future. The state of global equilibrium could be designed so that the basic material needs of each person on earth are satisfied and each person has an equal opportunity to realize his or her individual human potential.”(92)

   Now, think of how artistically rich the world is as a whole, and imagine the artistic, musical, poetic, and literary advances that could be made if everyone had the time and means to create. Imagine how scientifically advanced we as a species would be if everyone who wanted, could become scientists and mathematicians, theoretical physicists! The idea sent shivers up my spine. McKibben goes on to say that “you can’t really model the world on a computer”(92) as the Club of Rome had tried to do. But then again there is evidence that the whole universe is a computer simulation. (This article is a very interesting read.) And if it is, why wouldn’t you want to take care of what someone else took the time to program for you?

Eaarth - Chapter 1 Thoughts

The book "Eaarth: Making a Life on a Tough New Planet" by Bill McKibben is proving to be a very relevant and important read. In the first chapter McKibben hits us hard with the very real and honestly terrifying state of the world. He also reminds the reader time and again that WE and we alone are the cause for the problem. I couldn’t help but get chills. I’m not going to lie, I think this book is going to scare me. I’m talking I’m-going-to-have-trouble-sleeping-at-night terrified.  McKibbon says “The planet has nearly 390 parts per million carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.”(15-16) while the previously thought of “safe level” was 350 ppm. He goes on to speculate that “even if you erred on the side of insane optimism - the world in 2100 would have about 600 parts per million carbon dioxide.” (20) The scary thing is that with all the climate change deniers out there, this 600 ppm future could come sooner than 2100. I have little faith in humanity as a whole to wise up and fix the problem it alone created.

I recently discovered a sculpture artist by the name of Jason DeCaires Taylor, whose sculptural works are most often installed at the bottom of the ocean, really begging the question “Where IS our place in nature?”. His sculptures seemed especially relevant to me after reading this chapter. He even has one piece titled “Anthropocene”.

The picture that McKibben painted of our future earth, one that is far hotter than ours, one with acidified oceans and not as much biodiversity. It reminded me too much of Nausicaa’s world from the Studio Ghibli film Nausicaa Of the Valley of the Wind. In which the soil and water are both so toxic that the plants that grow on that soil are poisonous. The lakes are so acidic that if you step into them the water immediately begins to corrode your flesh. In the story, the protagonist, Nausicaa, discovers through growing poisonous plant spores in pure filtered water that it’s not the plants that are toxic, it’s the outside soil and water. She laments about how humans have poisoned the earth. I watched this movie when I was very young, so the notion that humans aren’t good for the environment has always been in my mind. Then again several of Studio Ghibli’s films deal with humans and their tendency to disrupt the natural order of things. Even still, just the first 50 or so pages of Eaarth really drove it home with hard facts and numbers.  

                                                                      

Welcome!

Hello!
     My name is Clara, I am a second year art student. This is my first semester in the BFA Painting program, I am mostly excited about it, but as with almost everything in my life I am feeling a little bit of doubt about both my abilities (technically and conceptually) and whether or not painting is actually the Right Program For Me. I suppose all I can do is wait and see where it takes me.

Kalamazoo Nature
 Center logo

     I took this class partly because I needed some Honors College credits, but also because the name, "Our Place in Nature", sounded so interesting to me. I have always loved being outside and in nature. As a kid my friends and I would spend the whole day outside, climbing trees and making "soup" out of water, flowers, and various other plant/earth materials. My mother would take my younger sibling and I out to the Kalamazoo Nature Center every week when we were little, I know those trails like the back of my hand. My favorite areas were always the river and the rock quarry, where we would grind up these soft rocks we called "paint rocks" and draw on ourselves. Both my parents are very artistically inclined, my mother being a painter, and my father doodling sometimes but mostly making music. He has recently gotten really into 3D printing. We sometimes teach a workshop together where we walk people through the steps to building their own Ultimaker Original + 3D printer. In addition to instilling a deep love of art in me, my parents raised me to respect nature and our planet.
     My favorite season is winter. I'll be walking in the snow and realize where I am and I'll just laugh out loud because I love snow so much. I love when it's pitch black out and you can only see the snow in the streetlights, it makes me feel like I'm underwater. If the light is slightly off color, be it pink or yellow, the falling snow looks like gold. I find the most aesthetic beauty in winter.
     Some other fun facts about me are that the farthest I've ever been from home is Vancouver, Washington, moths are my favorite bug, I love to knit and I don't like mashed potatoes (although every other form of potato I do enjoy).
   
Thank you for reading this post, I hope that you enjoy this blog!
           
                            - Clara Peeters